Systematic reviews are resource-intensive and require a comprehensive, detailed and reproducible search of various sources. The aim of searching multiple databases and employing additional methods is to minimise bias (Cochrane handbook, Ch. 4.2.2) and increase the validity of a systematic review. Hence systematic planning in selecting appropriate databases is mandatory. These electronic databases can be divided into:
Make an appointment with a librarian for help identifying appropriate databases and sources of grey literature.
The freely accessible online database of biomedical journal citations and abstracts was created by the U.S. National Library of Medicine. More information here.
Using traditional electronic databases to search the literature does not always identify all relevant studies. Depending on the topic, one or all of the below methods may be appropriate.
The following guides provide more details on searching grey literature:
Not all clinical trials end in publications. Clinical Trial Registries help you locate otherwise unpublished or incomplete trials.
More information about trial registries and solving the problems associated with searching them is available through the Medical and health-related trials registers and research registers website managed by Julie Glanville and Carol Lefebvre
Network of the National Library of Medicine. (2020, April 23). How PubMed works: Introduction [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/EPVd3acGUkA
Australian sources:
International sources: