The findings of a systematic review will be based on the data extracted from the included studies. "Data collected for systematic reviews should be accurate, complete, and accessible for future updates of the review and data sharing" (Cochrane handbook, Ch. 5).
The module above from the University of South Australia describes the steps in the data extraction process. A video from Dr Saravana Kumar provides important tips for reviewers on preparing a data extraction worksheet.
The resources on this page provide tips on data extraction and links to guidelines and standards relating to the data extraction stage of a systematic review.
Data collection for systematic reviews should be performed using structured data collection forms (Li et al., 2022, 5.4.1). Data collection forms can be paper-based or electronic, or from commercially available products, such as Covidence. Each systematic review will have a customized data extraction form (or forms), specifically designed to extract the data required to answer the review question. It is important that review teams pilot the data extraction form to test its usability (Li et al., 2022, 5.4.1).
Tips
Fields commonly included in data extraction forms include those listed below. Remember data extraction forms need to be customized for individual systematic reviews.
The articles below provide guidance on data extraction for meta-analyses:
This webinar from Covidence 101 training provides an overview of the Data Extraction 2.0 feature in Covidence, tips on how to develop a data extraction template and tips on the extraction process in Covidence.